Alaska Under Attack: Trump's Oil Grab Threatens Indigenous Life

Alaska Under Attack: Trump's Oil Grab Threatens Indigenous Life FactArrow

Published: April 4, 2025

Written by Charlotte Ward

A Legacy Under Siege

Alaska’s wild expanses have long stood as a testament to nature’s resilience, a sprawling frontier where caribou roam and icy waters cradle ecosystems found nowhere else. Yet, this irreplaceable treasure now faces a relentless assault from the Department of the Interior under Secretary Doug Burgum. With a stroke of policy, the Bureau of Land Management has set its sights on unlocking the National Petroleum Reserve and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s Coastal Plain for oil and gas exploration, a move that promises short-term profits at the expense of a sustainable tomorrow. It’s a decision that doesn’t just threaten Alaska, it betrays the very idea of stewardship for future generations.

Burgum’s vision, cloaked in the rhetoric of 'American Energy Dominance,' echoes President Trump’s unwavering faith in fossil fuels as the path to prosperity. Reopening 82 percent of the Petroleum Reserve and the entire Coastal Plain isn’t progress, it’s a reckless gamble that prioritizes corporate bottom lines over the public good. For Alaskans, especially Indigenous communities who’ve thrived here for millennia, this isn’t about untapped potential, it’s about survival, their way of life hanging in the balance as drilling rigs loom on the horizon.

The urgency here cuts deep. Climate change isn’t a distant specter, it’s a present crisis, and the Arctic is its frontline. This region warms four times faster than anywhere else, a fact that amplifies every decision made about its future. To push forward with extraction now isn’t just tone-deaf, it’s a deliberate choice to accelerate the unraveling of a planet already on edge.

The False Promise of Prosperity

Supporters of these plans, like Burgum and Trump, paint a rosy picture of jobs and economic growth, dangling projects like the Ambler Road and Alaska LNG Pipeline as lifelines for a struggling state. Sure, the LNG pipeline could spark $16 billion in activity and carve out thousands of construction jobs, dropping gas prices for Alaskans weary of $8.69 per million BTU. Who wouldn’t want that? But dig into the details, and the shine fades fast. That $11 billion price tag for private investment isn’t a guarantee, it’s a hope, one shadowed by global markets already pivoting away from fossil fuels.

Take the Ambler Road. Yes, it could unlock minerals like copper and zinc, fueling temporary job booms. Yet, the ecological wreckage it’d leave behind, slicing through subsistence lands vital to Indigenous Alaskans, isn’t a footnote, it’s the story. These aren’t abstract trade-offs. Caribou herds don’t rebound from disrupted migration routes, and oil spills in Arctic waters don’t vanish with a cleanup crew. The economic upside is a mirage when you factor in the long-term costs, costs that hit hardest those least equipped to bear them.

History backs this up. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline brought wealth to the North Slope Borough in the 1970s, sure, but it also fractured Indigenous land rights and left ecosystems reeling. Today’s push repeats that pattern, only now we know better. The shale boom made the U.S. a global energy titan by 2019, yet it didn’t shield us from market swings or stop energy costs from creeping up as exports soared. Chasing dominance through oil is a tired playbook, one that ignores the renewable revolution already reshaping the world.

Opponents of regulation, like Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy, argue federal land withdrawals choke statehood promises and Native allotments. They’ve got a point, the Alaska Statehood Act did envision resource development. But that vision never accounted for a climate crisis that’s redrawing coastlines and upending lives. Sovereignty doesn’t mean torching your own backyard for a quick buck, it means building a future that lasts.

The real kicker? Alternatives exist. The EPA’s $20 million solar investment in rural Alaska proves clean energy can deliver jobs and affordability without gutting the land. Why bet on a dying industry when we could lead the charge toward something better?

A Call to Protect What’s Left

This fight isn’t just about Alaska, it’s about who we are as a nation. Burgum’s orders, tied to Trump’s Executive Order 14153, frame energy as a zero-sum game, where drilling more somehow makes us stronger. That’s a fantasy. Flooding Europe with LNG might’ve checked Russia in 2023, but it also frayed ties with allies pushing for climate action. Real strength lies in adaptation, in harnessing wind and solar to power a world that’s already moving on.

For Alaskans watching their fisheries dwindle and their winters vanish, this isn’t theory, it’s reality. Indigenous voices, too often sidelined, have been crystal clear, oil rigs don’t coexist with subsistence living. The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act tried to settle these tensions in 1971, but it didn’t foresee a future where fossil fuels threaten the very lands it promised to protect. We owe them more than broken promises.

The path forward demands courage, not capitulation. Halting new Arctic leases and doubling down on renewables isn’t a retreat, it’s a reckoning with what’s at stake. We’ve got the tools, the technology, and the will, if only our leaders would listen. Alaska’s extraordinary potential isn’t in its oil, it’s in its ability to show us a better way.