Why Privatizing Air Control Would Be a Disaster for Public Safety

FAA's staffing crisis demands urgent investment in controllers to ensure safety, efficiency, and equity in our skies.

Why Privatizing Air Control Would Be a Disaster for Public Safety FactArrow

Published: May 1, 2025

Written by Freddie King

A Crisis in the Skies

Every day, millions of Americans board flights, trusting the intricate dance of air traffic control to guide them safely. Yet, a silent crisis looms above: the Federal Aviation Administration is hemorrhaging air traffic controllers, with over 90 percent of its 313 facilities operating below recommended staffing levels. This isn’t just a bureaucratic hiccup; it’s a direct threat to the safety and efficiency of our national airspace. The recent push by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to 'supercharge' hiring and retention, while a step forward, falls short of the transformative action needed to secure our skies.

For years, the FAA has grappled with a shortage of fully certified controllers, now roughly 3,500 below target. Controllers face grueling schedules, mandatory overtime, and six-day workweeks, conditions that breed fatigue and elevate the risk of catastrophic errors. Recent near-misses and incidents reported by NASA’s Aviation Safety System underscore a chilling reality: understaffing isn’t just inconvenient; it’s dangerous. The current administration’s efforts to streamline hiring and offer incentives are commendable but lack the ambition to address the root causes of this crisis.

Advocates for aviation safety and worker rights argue that only robust federal investment, coupled with a commitment to equitable hiring and labor protections, can reverse this alarming trend. The stakes are clear: without decisive action, delays, cancellations, and safety risks will only worsen, eroding public trust in air travel. This moment demands more than quick fixes; it calls for a reimagining of how we value and support the workforce that keeps our skies safe.

The Human Cost of Understaffing

Air traffic controllers are the unsung heroes of aviation, managing thousands of flights with precision under immense pressure. But chronic understaffing has pushed them to the brink. Reports from the National Air Traffic Controllers Association highlight controllers battling exhaustion, with some facilities staffed at less than 60 percent of recommended levels. This isn’t just a workplace issue; it’s a public safety emergency. Fatigue-driven errors in high-stakes environments can have devastating consequences, as evidenced by recent high-profile incidents linked to overworked staff.

The FAA’s new incentives, like $10,000 bonuses for graduates assigned to hard-to-staff facilities and lump-sum payments to delay retirements, are a start. Yet, these measures feel like Band-Aids on a gaping wound. Training a controller takes years, and with retirements outpacing new hires, the pipeline remains strained. The agency’s goal to hire 2,000 controllers in 2025 is ambitious, but without addressing burnout, mental health, and workplace conditions, retention will continue to falter. Advocates for workers’ rights insist that better pay, mental health support, and flexible schedules are critical to keeping experienced controllers on the job.

Contrast this with proposals from some policymakers who prioritize cost-cutting over workforce investment. Suggestions to limit union influence or rely on private sector partnerships risk undermining the expertise and accountability of a public workforce. Such approaches ignore the human toll of understaffing and the indispensable role of collective bargaining in ensuring fair treatment. The path forward lies in valuing controllers as essential public servants, not as cogs in a machine to be optimized for profit.

Equity and Opportunity in the Pipeline

Beyond safety, the FAA’s staffing crisis presents an opportunity to build a more inclusive workforce. The agency’s efforts to streamline hiring, such as cutting the process from eight to five steps and expanding opportunities for military veterans, are steps in the right direction. However, a truly transformative approach would prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion in recruitment. Partnerships with universities and community colleges, particularly those serving underrepresented groups, could expand the talent pool and bring fresh perspectives to a field long dominated by a narrow demographic.

Democratic lawmakers have championed grants to modernize training and broaden access to aviation careers, recognizing that a diverse workforce strengthens resilience and innovation. The FAA’s Enhanced Air Traffic Collegiate Training Initiative, which allows graduates from select universities to bypass the Oklahoma City academy, is a promising model. Expanding this program and investing in scholarships for low-income and minority students could democratize access to these high-skill, well-paying jobs. Yet, without sustained funding and a commitment to equity, these efforts risk falling short.

Skeptics might argue that focusing on diversity dilutes merit-based hiring. This critique misses the mark. Inclusive recruitment doesn’t lower standards; it widens the net to find talent that has been historically overlooked. By investing in diverse candidates and providing robust training, the FAA can build a workforce that reflects the nation it serves while addressing critical staffing gaps. This isn’t just a moral imperative; it’s a practical necessity for a system under strain.

A Call for Bold Investment

The FAA’s staffing crisis is a symptom of a broader failure to invest in public infrastructure. For too long, austerity-minded policies have starved agencies of the resources needed to meet growing demands. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act created new opportunities, but the labor supply hasn’t kept pace. A 2024 Bipartisan Policy Center report warns of a looming deficit of six million workers across critical sectors by 2032, with transportation among the hardest hit. The solution lies in bold federal action: increased funding for training, modernized facilities, and competitive compensation to attract and retain talent.

Unions and aviation safety advocates are clear: stronger labor protections, better working conditions, and comprehensive training are non-negotiable. The FAA’s new Learning Center and plans for mobile training apps are positive steps, but they must be paired with systemic reforms. Upgrading outdated equipment, reducing training backlogs, and ensuring controllers have the support they need to thrive are essential to restoring trust in the system. These investments aren’t just about safety; they’re about economic vitality, as delays and cancellations ripple through industries reliant on air travel.

The time for half-measures is over. The administration’s focus on streamlining processes and offering incentives is a start, but it’s not enough. Congress must act to fully fund the FAA’s workforce development programs, prioritize worker well-being, and reject shortsighted calls for privatization or deregulation. Our skies are a public trust, and those who keep them safe deserve nothing less than our unwavering commitment. Anything short of that is a betrayal of the millions who depend on air travel every day.