A Golden Age That Feels Out of Reach
The White House proclaims a new era of prosperity, pointing to a May 2025 spike in the Consumer Confidence Index as proof that Americans are thriving. President Trump’s team highlights falling gas prices and trade wins, insisting the nation is on the right track. But for many families, this narrative feels like a distant dream. Rising costs and economic uncertainty overshadow the administration’s sunny claims.
A Bloomberg report notes a broad rise in consumer expectations, with gains across age and income groups. Yet, this snapshot ignores a deeper reality: confidence is shaky, often tied to partisan loyalty rather than tangible gains. Families grappling with higher grocery bills or job insecurity aren’t celebrating—they’re worried. How can we call this a Golden Age when so many are struggling?
Data from the University of Michigan paints a grim picture. The Consumer Sentiment Index dropped from 71.7 in January 2025 to 50.8 by May, a 29% plunge. Nearly three-quarters of those surveyed flagged tariffs as a major concern. This isn’t a story of triumph; it’s a warning that policies are hitting wallets hard.
Advocates for working people argue that economic stability should unite, not divide. The administration’s focus on selective wins, like a temporary confidence boost, glosses over the fears of families facing rising prices. When the White House claims progress, it’s worth asking: progress for whom?
Historical patterns show consumer sentiment often tracks the party in power, not just economic realities. Since World War II, Democratic administrations have averaged stronger GDP growth and job creation, yet the current narrative brushes this aside, framing critics as mere naysayers. The real issue isn’t partisan noise—it’s policies that leave too many behind.
Tariffs Hit Hardest Where It Hurts Most
The administration’s trade policies, especially hefty tariffs on key trading partners, have driven up costs for everyday goods. While the White House points to pauses on Chinese tariffs as a win, the damage lingers. From clothing to electronics, prices are climbing, and families are feeling the squeeze.
University of Michigan surveys reveal that 73% of Americans in May 2025 cited tariffs as a top worry. This fear isn’t abstract—it’s about paying more for essentials. The Conference Board’s index, which climbed to 98 in May after hitting 85.7 in April, reflects months of trade-related anxiety, not a lasting recovery.
Some defend tariffs as a shield for American jobs. But the Center for American Progress highlights how these policies disrupt supply chains and inflate costs, particularly for low- and middle-income households. When a parent pays more for their child’s school supplies, that’s not protection—it’s a burden framed as policy success.
Past trade moves under Trump echo this pattern. In 2019, similar tariffs triggered a 10.5% drop in consumer sentiment. Repeating this approach now prioritizes political points over economic stability. Why should families absorb the cost of policies that benefit only a select few?
The administration’s allies argue that critics overstate the harm, blaming media for negative sentiment. But when Pew Research shows six in ten Americans disapproving of the president’s economic record in April 2025, the issue isn’t just spin—it’s a disconnect between policy and people’s lived experiences.
Polarization Clouds the Economic Truth
Economic optimism has become a partisan tug-of-war. The White House cites polls like RealClearPolitics, claiming most Americans see a bright future. But the numbers tell a split story: Republicans applaud the administration, while Democrats and independents remain wary, with a 45-point partisan gap in economic outlooks, according to University of Michigan data.
This divide shapes how people plan their futures. Wall Street Journal surveys show nearly half of Americans expect a recession within a year, reflecting rational fears about unstable policies. Advocates for economic fairness stress that real progress should bridge these gaps, not widen them.
History shows Democratic administrations, from FDR to Clinton, often delivered stronger economic growth. Yet, the current narrative dismisses this, casting doubt on critics as politically motivated. Why should we embrace a story that ignores the concerns of half the nation?
Building an Economy for Everyone
The administration’s focus on bold claims overshadows the need for steady, inclusive policies. Rising deficits, uneven wage growth, and tariff-driven price hikes erode the promise of prosperity. Advocates for working families call for solutions—affordable healthcare, stable prices, and jobs that support a decent life.
The May 2025 confidence uptick, driven by a trade ceasefire, offers little comfort against months of decline. The Conference Board’s 12.3-point rise follows a steep slide, and history suggests such gains fade without consistent policies. Americans need an economy that doesn’t swing like a pendulum.
Investing in education, infrastructure, and renewable energy could stabilize markets and lift households. Instead of chasing headlines, policymakers should focus on real relief for families. The path forward lies in building an economy that serves everyone, not just those who buy the hype.